Discussion about this post

User's avatar
DW's avatar

In article 3, section 1, who is the "president?"

Expand full comment
Daniel Lazare's avatar

A few thoughts. The requirement that a PM must have at least 350 votes and that a snap election must be called if he or she leaves office prematurely is worrisome. Doesn't this preclude a minority government in which a party or coalition with a plurality takes power because the majority is hopeless split? It also seems to preclude a cabinet reshuffle in which the ruling coalition decides to change PM's in mid-stream. Both are important democratic instruments that should not be ruled out. I'm leery of referenda and therefore don't think they should have as big a role. And the 420-vote supermajority required for expelling a member bothers me as well. What if the govt wants to expel outright fascists? Shouldn't it have the power to do so on its own? Wouldn't a supermajority place it at the mercy of conservatives with whom the fascists may be allied? I certainly applaud the House's ability to amend the constitution through a simple majority vote, but would add something to the effect that everything in the document is amendable except Art. I, sec. 2, i.e. the fact that "full legislative and executive powers shall be vested in a unicameral legislature." Everything is up for grabs in a democracy except democracy itself.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts